Luck Fables

I Dissent against the tyranny of the state and the collectives that usurp the amalgamate power of the represented. No democrat, no republican, no independent, no anarchy, no collective, no tower of labels represent me. I am one.

I'd like to discuss the repetition method used in corporate media propaganda to limit discourse of human events.

The use of repetition of words and phrases is a primary method for the principalities of the oligarchy to control the mind of the populace by framing individual issues with preconceptions. This guides all conversations around the water cooler into those preconceptions, and attempts to limit the minds ability to see outside the box they wish us to view the world through. Once you become aware of this technique being used, you begin to notice how often it is being used. In this show, I would like to isolate and document specific uses of this technique by identifying and creating a list of them.

Overall I want to talk about taking back language from those who misuse it - to call out spin as lying - deception, and empowering the free minds of the liberty movement by reclaiming the language and turning it back into the value added activity of discourse, rather than the control and coercion uses that the oligarchy puts it to. I am going to do my best to challenge your preconceptions. I would very much appreciate the challenge of mine. I seek the full discourse that our founders had when they faced the tyranny of the british king and from that conflict forged the single greatest form of government so far invented by the human race.

There are unwritten rules of society, one such is that Religion and politics are not to be discussed in open company - it is taboo. the reason this taboo exists is because somewhere is a room full of people, and they are talking about religion and politics and they do not want YOU involved. Because that room has acronyms like CFR and Bilderberg on the door, and to them you are a mere plebe who couldnt possibly know what is best for you, your life, your family, or your community. Some examples to consider:

You cant fight city hall

This rumor comes from city hall! but we repeat it and therefore give it power and credence, and because perception is truth, it becomes truth! It is not truth, and our founders proved it by watering the tree of liberty.

Polite society

This phrase is an oxymoron. In order to maintain these preconceptions, further repetition is used to cement the perception that what authority says is true. They will vilify anyone who refuses to comply, using lies and false arguments to entrench the preconception that they themselves have forged into the minds of the general populace.

Common fallacy number one

argumentum ad verecundiam

Because an authority says so, it must be true.

This is false. Authority on this planet is itself a lie, based on the threat of physical or financial violence. Reward and punishment. If you are at work you might be fired for; disagreeing with your boss. In your personal life you might not get what you want from someone if you disagree with them. if you do not tow the line of your significant other, you will be treated punitively by withholding something from you that you value. Stay in line and you will get a promotion. Stay in line and you will get laid. Appeals to authority based on punitive threats are not true, they are the threat of violence veiled by the detritus built up over time around the label "Authority".

Spin

This word is used to remove the negative connotations associated with lying. Spin is nothing more than lying. it is deception, and deception only. The military-industrial-financial-medical-media-insurance complex wants you to accept the lies as truth, and repeat the word spin until it is believed to BE true. Anytime spin is used to justify the patently false nature of a given statement, you have learned who is a liar. Remember them, for they will lie to you again.

I would like to see this misuse of the word spin removed from our minds and words, and everywhere it is used by the sleeping, replace it with its true definition : falsehood, deception, lie.

Iraq war

This phrase was used so many times that it is now believed to be a war. no war was declared by the congress of the united states. There was an illegal invasion of a soverign nation, and now a continuing illegal occupation of that nation. By refusing to use their terms, we empower ourselves and the truth. Some might argue that illegal invasion is too long, that the citizens minds are not capable of these terms. This is again more falsehood, as I would argue that this repetition of lies is what empowers the instantaneous gratification nature of our populace and promulgates the sound bytes of the corporate media, further cementing their preconceptions in the minds of our fellow citizens.

Drug war

The drug war is another prime example of repetition of a lie to alter perception and create the illusion of truth. the drug war is a deception phrase used to obfuscate the truth that what they are doing is prohibition, which was STRUCK DOWN. Some would argue that drugs constitute a threat to society - and they are right in the context of societys lies. Use and abuse are very different things. Marijuana as a specific example frees the mind from these lies, these preconceptions, and allows an individual to perceive something that they might not ordinarily see - to look outside the preconceptions of the liars, and see for themselves. This is why marijuana is prohibited - it directly impacts the ability of society to maintain the web of lies told to its citizenry. this was certainly the case in my life, I did not use any drugs until I was 18, rationalizing that it would be harmful to my development as an biological entity. Once I was 18, my body chemistry was done, i no longer had growing pains and I used every drug that I found. Not because I wanted to be high, or to escape - but because when I asked every adult why they were opposed to any given drug, they could not give me a reasonable answer. I asked if they themselves had used the drug and they said no. Then I asked, how do you know its bad if you have not experienced it yourself? Those adults I asked this question of had no answer other than the appeal to authority - argumentum ad verecundiam - because they were told so. Because they were lied to, and wanted me to empower their subjectively unfounded preconceptions.

Since I believe in empirical evidence, I ignored the lies and tried whatever I wanted, and learned for myself, what was good for me and what was not.

Of all the drugs I have used, I have found only marijuana to have permanent value in my life. i am not using at the moment, Not because I am afraid, or cannot find it - but because I have lost all faith in western medicine outside of immediate trauma response. I am seeing an Ayurvedic doctor, and the prescriptions of teas and oils have done more for me than thirty years of western medicine. The doc says that marijuana in my system interferes with his ability to ascertain my state of being, and so I choose not to use because I am not an addict. I am not an abuser.

I am a user, and the plain fact of the matter is that any substance, wether it is caffeine, or nicotine, or tetra hydra cannibinol has no intrinisic moral or ethical value. It is how we use things in the world that endow them with ethical or moral value.

Like how we use words - Like how the state misuses them.

The boogeyman

Both of these misuses of language, the iraq war (imperialist empire), the drug war (prohibition), are uses of the age old aristocratic form of control : fear. The drug war, prohibition, failed the moment it began. It was not a sustainable boogeyman. Too many people know better. It was not going to work out for long term control of the populace. A new boogeyman had to be found. A new label to orient the engendered fear of the group-mind to rally against. Terrorism. A boogeyman who will never end, who never dies, who can never be caught, who can never be defeated, who can always be feared, year after year, until the people awaken from the warlords' dream of hateful dominion.

I would like through this medium to identify, clarify and codify these misuses of language so that we can be better armed to engage our fellow citizens in the full discourse of human events that our founders intended us to have, without the illusory mental prison created by the liars misuse of words.

So long as even we, the individuals who stand for liberty, continue to use their terms, we empower their lies and diminish our truth.

Luck Fables!